Here are some of my quick thoughts about the GRE writing section and some I've culled from the Internet. Have a look.
Read the question carefully. Determine what it is arguing, and what criteria it is using to make that argument.
Quickly jot down some brief thoughts or words related to the issue to get you thinking.
Determine whether you have more to say in support of the argument or against the argument.
If you don’t think you can take a stand on one side or another, you should be ready to support part of the argument and disagree with another part, or indicate that you partially agree, and be ready to say why.
Tips for "The Argument Analysis Task"
Your task is
to present a compelling case for your own position on
the issue. Be sure to read the claim carefully and
think about it from several points of view, considering
the complexity of ideas associated with those
perspectives. Then, make notes about the position
you want to develop and list the main reasons and
examples that you could use to support that position.
The Issue task allows considerable latitude in the
way you respond to the claim. Although it is important
that you address the central issue, you are free to
take any approach you wish. For example, you might
• agree absolutely with the claim, disagree completely,
or agree with some parts and not others
• question the assumptions the statement seems to
be making
• qualify any of its terms, especially if the way you
define or apply a term is important to developing
your perspective on the issue
• point out why the claim is valid in some situations
but not in others
• evaluate points of view that contrast with your
own perspective
• develop your position with reasons that are
supported by several relevant examples or by a
single extended example
The GRE readers scoring your response are not
looking for a “right” answer—in fact, there is no
correct position to take. Instead, the readers are
evaluating the skill with which you articulate and
develop an argument to support your position on the
issue.
• carefully read the claim made in the topic and
make sure you understand the issue involved; if
it seems unclear, discuss it with a friend or
teacher
• think about the issue in relation to your own
ideas and experiences, to events you have read
about or observed, and to people you have
known; this is the knowledge base from which
you will develop compelling reasons and examples
in your argument that reinforce, negate,
or qualify the claim in some way
• decide what position on the issue you want to
take and defend—remember you are free to
agree or disagree completely or to agree with
some parts or some applications but not others
• decide what compelling evidence (reasons and
examples) you can use to support your position
Remember that this is a task in critical thinking and
persuasive writing. Therefore, you might find it
helpful to explore the complexity of a claim in one of
the topics by asking yourself the following questions:
• What, precisely, is the central issue?
• Do I agree with all or with any part of the claim?
Why or why not?
• Does the claim make certain assumptions? If so,
are they reasonable?
• Is the claim valid only under certain conditions?
If so, what are they?
• Do I need to explain how I interpret certain
terms or concepts used in the claim?
• If I take a certain position on the issue, what
reasons support my position?
• What examples—either real or hypothetical—
could I use to illustrate those reasons and
advance my point of view? Which examples are
most compelling?
Once you have decided on a position to defend,
consider the perspective of others who might not
agree with your position. Ask yourself:
• What reasons might someone use to refute or
undermine my position?
• How should I acknowledge or defend against
those views in my essay?
To plan your response, you might want to summarize
your position and make brief notes about how you
will support the position you’re going to take.
The Argument-Analysis Writing Task
The Argument-Analysis writing task is designed to test your critical-reasoning skills as well as your writing skills. Your task is to critique the stated argument in terms of its cogency (logical soundness) and in terms of the strength of the evidence offered in support of the argument.
Your Argument-Analysis question will consist of two elements:
the directive: a brief instruction for responding to the argument (the directive is always the same)
the argument: a paragraph-length passage, which presents an argument (introduced as a quotation from some fictitious source)
Here's a simulated Argument-Analysis question. This question is similar to the ones on the actual GRE. Keep in mind, however, that it is not one of the official questions, so you won't see this one on the actual exam. (I'm not permitted to reproduce the actual test questions at this Website.)
.
Simulated Argument-Analysis Question
Discuss how well reasoned you find the argument below.
The following appeared in a memo from the manager of UpperCuts hair salon:
"According to a nationwide demographic study, more and more people today are moving from suburbs to downtown areas. In order to boost sagging profits at UpperCuts, we should take advantage of this trend by relocating the salon from its current location in Apton’s suburban mall to downtown Apton, while retaining the salon’s decidedly upscale ambiance. Besides, Hair-Dooz, our chief competitor at the mall, has just relocated downtown and is thriving at its new location, and the most prosperous hair salon in nearby Brainard is located in that city’s downtown area. By emulating the locations of these two successful salons, UpperCuts is certain to attract more customers."
.
Now here's a sample response to this question. As you read the response, keep in mind:
- Each one of the "body" paragraphs isolates and discusses a distinct flaw in the argument. A typical GRE argument will contain 3-4 flaws. (This simulated Argument contains 4 major flaws).
- This response is relatively simple in style and language and brief enough (410 words) to compose and type in 30 minutes.
- This response meets all the ETS criteria for a score of 6 (the highest possible score).
Sample Response (410 Words)
The manager of UpperCuts (UC) argues here that UC would improve its profitability by relocating from a suburban mall to downtown Apton. To support this argument, the manager relies in part on a certain study about demographic trends, and in part on the fact that two other similar businesses are located in downtown areas. However, the manager's reasoning rests on a series of unproven assumptions, which together undermine the argument.
One such assumption is that Apton reflects the cited demographic trend. The mere fact that one hair salon has moved downtown hardly suffices to show that the national trend applies to Apton specifically. For all we know, in Apton there is no such trend, or perhaps the trend is in the opposite direction. Thus I would need to know whether more people are in fact moving to downtown Apton before I could either accept or reject the manager’s proposal.
Even assuming that downtown Apton is attracting more residents, relocating downtown might not result in more customers for UC, especially if downtown residents are not interested in UC’s upscale style and prices. Besides, Hair-Dooz might draw potential customers away from UC, just as it might have at the mall. Before I can accept that UC would attract more customers downtown, the manager would need to supply clear proof of a sufficient demand downtown for UC’s service.
Even if there would be a high demand for UC’s service in downtown Apton, an increase in the number of patrons would not necessarily improve UC’s profitability. UC’s expenses might be higher downtown, in which case it might be no more, or perhaps even less, profitable downtown than at the mall. Therefore, before I could agree with the proposal, I would need to examine a comparative cost-benefit analysis for the two locations.
As for the Brainard salon, its success might be due to particular factors that don’t apply to UC. For example, perhaps the Brainard salon thrives only because it is long-established in downtown Brainard. Accordingly, in order to determine whether the success of the Brainard salon portends success for UC in downtown Apton, I would need to know why the former salon is successful in the first place.
In sum, the argument relies on what might amount to two poor analogies -- between UC and two other salons -- as well as a sweeping generalization about demographic trends, which may or may not apply to Apton. As a result, without the additional information indicated above, I find the argument unconvincing at best.
The Issue-Perspective Writing Task
The Issue-Perspective section is designed to test your ability to communicate your opinion on an issue effectively and persuasively. Your task is to analyze the issue presented, considering various perspectives, and to develop your own position on the issue. There is no "correct" answer.
Your Issue-Perspective question will consist of two elements:
the directive: a brief instruction for responding to the statement (the directive is always the same)
the topic: a one- or two-sentence statement of opinion about a particular issue of general intellectual interest
Here's a simulated Issue-Perspective question. This question is similar to the ones on the actual GRE. Keep in mind, however, that it is not one of the official questions, so you won't see this one on the actual exam. (I'm not permitted to reproduce the actual test questions at this Website.)
.
Simulated Issue-Perspective Question
Present your perspective on the issue below, using relevant reasons and/or examples to support your views.
"Look at any person today who has achieved great success in his or her career or profession, and you'll see either someone without a significant personal life or someone with significant personal failings."
.
Now here's a sample response to this question. As you read the response, keep in mind:
- None of the points asserted in this response are irrefutable, because the issue is far from "black-and-white." It's all a matter of opinion.
-
- The author of the response partially agrees, but ultimately disagrees with the statement’s wording, which refers to “any person.” Such a statement is difficult to defend, and you should remember that even if you agree with the idea in general, you must respond to the specific statement.
-
- This response is relatively simple in style and language and brief enough (463 words) to compose and type in 45 minutes.
-
- This response meets all the ETS criteria for a score of 6 (the highest possible score).
Sample Response (463 Words)
I agree with the statement insofar as great professional success often comes at the expense of one's personal life, and can even be inextricably related to one's personal failings. However, the statement is problematic in that it unfairly suggests that personal and professional success are mutually exclusive in every case.
Undeniably, today's professionals must work long hours to keep their heads above water, let alone to get ahead in life financially. This is especially true in Japan, where cost of living, coupled with corporate culture, compel professional males to all but abandon their families and literally to work themselves to death. While the situation here in the states may not be as critical, the two-income family is now the norm, not by choice but by necessity.
However, our society's professionals are taking steps to remedy the problem. First, they are inventing ways--such as job sharing and telecommuting--to ensure that personal life is not sacrificed for career. Second, they are setting priorities and living those hours outside the workplace to their fullest. In fact, professional success usually requires the same time-management skills that are useful to find time for family, hobbies, and recreation. Third, more professionals are changing careers to ones which allow for some degree of personal fulfillment and self-actualization. Besides, many professionals truly love their work and would do it without compensation, as a hobby. For them, professional and personal fulfillment are one and the same.
Admittedly, personal failings often accompany professional achievement. In fact, the two are often symbiotically related. The former test the would-be achiever's mettle; they pose challenges--necessary resistance that drives one to professional achievement despite personal shortcomings. In the arts, a personal failing may be a necessary ingredient or integral part of the process of achieving. Artists and musicians often produce their most creative works during periods of depression, addiction, or other distress. In business, insensitivity to people can breed grand achievements, as with the questionable labor practices of the great philanthropist Andrew Carnegie.
However, for every individual whose professional success is bound up in his or her personal failings, there is another individual who has achieved success in both realms. One need only look at the recent American presidents--Carter, Reagan, and Bush--to see that it is possible to lead a balanced life which includes time for family, hobbies, and recreation, while immersed in a busy and successful career.
In sum, I agree that as a general rule people find it difficult to achieve great success both personally and professionally, and in fact history informs us that personal failings are often part-and-parcel of great achievements. However, despite the growing demands of career on today's professionals, a fulfilling personal life remains possible--by working smarter, by setting priorities, and by making suitable career choices.